Category Archives: Literature

Interview: Joseph Sale, Author of ‘The Darkest Touch’

University of Birmingham student Joseph Sale recently released his debut novel, The Darkest Touch, with American publishing house Dark Hall Press. If having a novel published at twenty-years old wasn’t enough, all paperback copies sold out in the first week and the novel reached #6 on the Kindle Horror download bestsellers list. Elisha Owen talks to Joseph about his writing process and experience with publication. 

Q. A huge congratulations on the publication of your debut novel. Tell us a bit about yourself.

A. Thanks very much! This is always one of the harder questions. I suppose to start I’m currently in my third year at the University of Birmingham doing an English with Creative Writing degree and about to graduate this year. I’m a fencer and a musician and I work in Bournemouth at Quantum Card Services. I loved books and literature since I was little and, unless I’ve been inserted into an artificial dream-tank, I’m a novelist and author of The Darkest Touch.    

Q. You’ve self-published novels in the past. What made you decide to try a professional press, and how did you go about doing that? 

A. The issue with self publishing is that you have to become an entire publishing house on your own: editor, reader, artist, marketer, salesman, copywriter, all at once! Unless you have an incredible understanding of the market and how to promote your work without alienating people, you ultimately can’t reach an audience. Self-publishing has become a more respected industry and professional writers are starting to use it for side projects or more experimental works, but it still doesn’t have the seal of approval that a professional publication has, and doesn’t get you the reach you need. Getting readers is more important than making money, at least for me. I want lots of people to read my work because I feel I have something to say which might change the way they think, even help them. I knew that professional publication was the way to achieve that. 

Getting your book professionally published requires a lot of work. Most people think about perfecting their manuscript, but in a way, I found that wasn’t the major issue. It was learning how to write a good cover-letter (which needs to have an elevator pitch style snapshot – something to get them excited), learning about what publishers expect from a manuscript, and learning about where to send my work that were the real challenges. Luckily for our generation, almost all of the information you need is online, you just have to find it. Though it took me roughly 1 ½  years to finish The Darkest Touch (not the first draft, but a fully edited capacity), it’s really the sum of 5 years of research. 

No one gets picked up straight away. It got rejected from one other publisher before it was accepted – but only because it didn’t fit the publisher’s aesthetic. That’s when I knew it had at least a shot. I sent it off again, just the first three chapters and a pitch, to Dark Hall Press. They said that if I didn’t hear back in 3 weeks they weren’t interested. On day 21, I’d given up, but at 9:00 in the evening they sent me an email saying they’d like to see the whole thing – talk about cutting it fine! 

Q. Give us a brief synopsis of the novel. 

A. A nuclear World War 3 has happened. From the radiated ashes of this calamity, a group of individuals ‘touched’ by a dark power assert their control over the ruined New York city, slaughtering any baby or child that displays signs of the ‘touch’. But voices speak in the deep. Rebels gather. One of the touched goes rogue. The fabric of their reign is starting to unravel. All it needs to topple is one, soft, touch. 

Q. Where did you draw inspiration from and what other writers influence you? 

A. Where to begin!? Originally, I was heavily influenced by fantasy writers – in particular Tolkien and George R. R. Martin. Several times I tried to recreate their epic fantasy worlds, but without any success. Then I encountered Stephen King and I realised that I had a whole different story inside of me I hadn’t been able to see before. 

King is quite simply a genius storyteller, and really understands how to shake you with language. Most people think horror is full of cheap scares, but King will make you laugh, cry, weep, and sing – there’s life in his writing. Everything feels so real you can touch it. The Stand, his 1800 page epic post-apocalyptic masterpiece, was obviously a huge influence on the choice of setting for my story. The stand helped me see the ancient, the fantastical, the biblical, the mythical in our own world – it was a liberating experience. 

The other thing that heavily influenced The Darkest Touch was the Bible. In fact, the whole text, in a way, stems from one quote from the Gospel of St John: “In him was life and that life was the life of men. The light shines in the darkness, but the darkness has not understood it.” (John 1:4-5). The darkness does not understand the light. It’s such a profound statement. How many suffering people do you know who have rejected your help a thousand times? Who will not accept help? How many people are blank to your pleas to be reasonable? We live in a world of darkness, and occasionally, just occasionally, a light shines in – a mercy, a grace, a justice – but it’s too bright and brilliant for us to get hold of. 

Whatever your beliefs, the personal, symbolic truth of the biblical stories, at least from my experience of the world, is irrefutable. Christ speaks figuratively and in parables, and the Bible as a text is hugely symbolic. These symbols speak to us in a way that scientific fact never will. Adam and Eve’s tale of lost innocence will always resonate with more emotional impact than a list of facts about puberty. Stories create truths, and the Bible is perhaps one of the deepest roots of story we know.  I wanted my own book to echo (never recreate – that’s impossible) this deep, profound mythic source and create its own web of symbols that the diligent reader might uncover. 

Q. Writing a book, while also completing your degree is extremely impressive. How do you manage balancing writing with your other commitments? 

A. It’s hard to keep up sometimes. I try to write every day – that way you build momentum and can finish projects in good time. You also don’t lose your train of thought, or lose sight of the threads you’ve woven together, so you have a clearer picture. It’s also good practice. If you want to be an Olympic athlete you train every day. Writing’s no different. Every day I’m training and hopefully improving. I never believe I’ll stop learning. 

Q. Do you have any advice for budding writers? 

A. Yes. Write every day – 500 words or 1 poem or one scene from a play/script. The first two weeks will be hell. You’ll be tired. In fact, you’ll be more exhausted than any time you went on a training camp or competed in a sport or did a midnight shift at work, but the third week it’ll get easier. Like a marathon runner you’ll have built up stamina. Writing every day is the single most important step to getting better. Don’t edit. Don’t stop. Write. Write as if you’re trying to save your life. That’s how I started anyway. When you’ve finished something big, or a collection of shorter works, then you can take 4-6 weeks off and edit. 

Q. In three words, why should people buy your book?

A. It’ll change you. 



The Darkest Touch is available in paperback from:

Amazon UK:

Amazon US:

Check out Dark Hall Press at – 

Tweet Joseph Sale @josephwordsmith


Charlie Hill’s ‘Books: Read it and Die!’ @ Book to the Future

charlie hill booksDuring their interview, Nicola Kalinsky, director of the Barber Institute of Fine Arts, asks Charlie Hill, “Why do you write?” The author is taken aback, and after a loaded pause he responds with “I think…you just gotta, really.”

Here to talk about his new satirical novel, Books: Read it and Die, Hill looks distinctly uncomfortable in the spotlight, and is quick to self-deprecate. The interview format of the talk is a clever one, for the confidence and enthusiasm of Kalinsky facilitates Hill’s momentum, and encourages the author to express some thoughtful and subtle perceptions on the culture of literature.

The novel’s origin can be traced to Hill’s days working in Waterstones, spending hours gazing at the ‘3 for 2’ section. In the late 90s the idea came to him to write a short story, aptly titled ‘3 for 2’, which was published in ‘Ambit’, and would later expand to become Books: Read it and Die. On the topic of his own success, the writer has a dark sense of humour: “A part of me rather hoped my book would be picked up by a big publisher and end up languishing in the ‘3 for 2’ aisle”. Upon this quip Kalinsky is quick to point out that Hill’s dark comic timing lends itself brilliantly to the bleak satire of the book.

The crux of the plot-line is the idea that consuming mediocre literature can be detrimental to the reader’s health. At one point the story’s anti-hero and heroine witness the death of a publicist, and the protagonist flippantly remarks, “I’m not surprised she nodded off, reading that rubbish!” This is a topic that Hill is clearly passionate about; with some coaxing from Kalinsky the writer is very expressive about his abhorrence for mediocrity. “Life is too short to read what is pushed at you, to listen to what you are told you must listen to. We need to push ourselves.”

He finds it hard that so many writers are content to churn out the same mundane material, purely to make money. When asked to define ‘mediocrity’ Hill need not hesitate, and states with certainty, “The reader needs to be moved, have their perspective shifted, even slightly. There needs to have been an impact, rather than simply reflecting a person’s life back to them.” He is just as quick to discount his own opinions though, and jokes, “Hopefully what I write isn’t quite as dogmatic as what I say.”

The audience’s interest has been piqued, and Nicola’s praise sells the book in a way one suspects Hill, himself, would be uncomfortable doing. From the beginning it is clear that this man is an author, not a salesman. He discusses the novel objectively, without the need to bolster its content. Books is written as a series of first person accounts: from the main character, who stridently preaches about the problems of mediocrity; to the villain, Gary Sales, exemplar of someone responsible for such problems, but who is so human in nature that Kalinsky can’t help but sympathise with.

Despite Hill’s jaded attitude towards our contemporary cultural diet, he remains frankly optimistic about the future of books. “People have been saying the novel is ‘dead’ since the 60s, it’s ridiculous.” “Everyone loves to panic,” Kalinsky agrees. On the ‘kindle craze’, the author does not see cause for alarm, saying paper publishing and kindle publishing are not in competition with each other, so different are their markets. What he is less certain of, however, is what contemporary fiction will stand to be the classics of tomorrow, as it is so difficult to challenge a society that has already seen and heard everything. “The Lighthouse by Alison Moore is excellent, but I just don’t know if it could be a classic.”

Whether Books: Read it and Die will stand the test of time is a different issue. Though if the author’s obvious passion for writing flows through its pages as eloquently as Kalinsky says, then it is guaranteed to be thought-provoking and as far removed from mediocrity as one could imagine- not to mention, beneficial to the reader’s health!

by Susie Dickey

Only Remembered: Michael Morpurgo @ Birmingham Hippodrome


This Remembrance Day weekend, national treasure and former children’s laureate Michael Morpurgo graced the Birmingham Hippodrome for ‘Only Remembered’. After a sell-out four-week run of the acclaimed National Theatre production War Horse, Michael joined musicians John Tams and Barry Coope to give an intimate reading of excerpts from the novel.

     If Michael Morpurgo hadn’t become a prolific children’s author, he would have made a remarkable stage actor. Although unassuming, as he walked on stage and smiled coyly at his audience, the moment he began to read I was immediately transported to the world of one horse’s experience in the First World War.

     Set in 1914, Joey, a young farm horse, is sold to the army and thrust into the midst of the war on the Western Front. Witnessing the horror of the front-line and the desolation of the trenches, Joey’s courage touches all who meet him.

     I first happened upon War Horse when I was nine years old. A rather precocious child, I was relieved to find that Morpurgo addressed me as an equal rather than subordinate. I began at last to understand the loss and suffering in the war my great-grandparents faced. It was the first novel that made me sit up and pay attention, and rightly so.

     The unequivocal horror of World War 1 claimed not only the lives of millions of men and women but also the lives of over six million horses. Morpurgo’s tale is an adept portrayal of the incomprehensible nature of war, as the reader sees the world from Joey’s perspective. Whilst completely aware of his younger audience, Morpurgo never shies away from highlighting the violence of human cruelty and disdain for both animals and each other. It is this bravery as an author that has no doubt won him respect from children across the world.

Jack Seely on his war horse Warrior

     Morpurgo was a fine and sensitive orator; heralding his days as a teacher. Each new accent, from Devonshire to German, was tackled flawlessly; waves of laughter erupted particularly at his depiction of a Welsh soldier. Funny and heartwarming throughout, his ability to change tone at the drop of a hat left me breathless on several occasions.

     One extract was particularly powerful when read aloud. ‘Mad Friedrich’, the German ammunitions cart driver is talking to Joey and another horse ‘Topthorne’:

‘I tell you, my friends,’ he said one day. ‘I tell you that I am the only sane man in the regiment. It’s the others that are mad, but they don’t know it. They fight a war and they don’t know what for. Isn’t that crazy? How can one man kill another and not really know the reason why he does it, except that the other man wears a different colour uniform and speaks a different language? And it’s me they call mad!’

     Unfortunately, I felt the background music detracted from Morpurgo’s reading. Although John Tams and Barry Coope were clearly talented musicians, the songs and synthesised keyboard seemed an odd choice and I often felt myself willing for it to stop so Morpurgo could continue with his story. The music did suit, however, when the two sang war songs from the period; this added an extra element of reality that grounded us even more in Joey’s world.

     The old adage ‘never meet your idols’ fell completely short. Michael Morpurgo was magnificent and I fell in love with War Horse all over again. It was a pleasure to see such a varied audience responding to his work. Groups of schoolchildren mingled with students and the elderly for an afternoon of reminding ourselves why Remembrance Day is so important.

By Elisha Owen


The Subject of Murder @ Book to the Future


Professor Lisa Downing’s talk marked the close of the University of Birmingham’s first six-day long literary festival. The controversial subject of murder was broached by Professor Downing through the medium of her much discussed book The Subject of Murder, released in March of this year. The event took the form of a reading from Professor Downing’s book, with explanations along the way, and questions from the audience closing the event.

The ideas discussed in the book conveyed many ideas about murders and their depiction in the media that I would previously not have considered. Yet, when brought up, such ideas make perfect sense with reference to the way in which we view murderers and their crimes. Downing opened the talk with the idea of murderers as being “immortalized”, in the glamorisation of their crimes through their representation in the media. Downing discussed how there is something intrinsically “exceptional” about murderers, so much so that they almost attain a “quasi-celebrity status”, and become an object of fascination, due to the hideous, yet strangely extraordinary acts they commit.

Downing also made reference to the idea of murderers needing to be understood in gender terms, where, quite blatantly and stereotypically, the killer is a white male, and the victim, a vulnerable female. Downing claimed that, when discussing murders, “only men are allowed to be transcendent, while women are imminent”, portraying the idea of men as “the subject of exception” when it comes to murder. She explained that men attain a somewhat higher status through the act of murder, where women are demoted, in their role as victim.

A key part of Downing’s talk aligned murderers with European ideas of beauty and art in the 18th century, right through to the 20th century. As I have previously stated, it is a way to explore the nature and representation of murderers that I would personally never have considered, yet the explanation perfectly explains our public perception of murderers as these omniscient figures, of whom we are made aware through their horrendous crimes against humanity. The alignment of a murderer, a traditional figure of evil and condemnation, and the idea of decadent beauty and artistry at first left me slightly uneasy and sceptical. However, Downing explained that the murderer parallels the artist in the sense that they are exempt from normal morality. An artist is allowed to create a morally or socially controversial painting in the name of art, where a murderer commits a heinous act outside of accepted social boundaries.

She also discussed the idea, or rather the fantasy, of murderers, that an act of destruction is close to an act of creation, giving the murderer an elevated view of themselves in moral terms. Downing thus went on to provide a point of comparison in the aesthetic alignment of a murderer with an artist, using the example of a thief, a small-time criminal. She stated that a thief heralds a lack of artistic interest; their crime is merely petty and pathetic; it has no deeper connotations. A murderer on the other hand, would be, somewhat wrongly, “elevated in aesthetic value”, for the sheer depth of their crime, as opposed to the relatively miniscule impact a thief leaves in his wake.

Downing also interestingly deliberated the notion of the murderer as beast, an idea I could personally understand a little more than her alignment of a murder to ideals of beauty. This concept was explained in reference to scientific ideas of the 19th century. Downing explained the ideas of physiognomy, and the notion that the essence of a murderer can be read in his or her face, suggesting a “reliance upon the body as a map to an individual’s nature”. Downing of course then addressed the often discussed idea of male sexuality, that murder is simply the male expression of untamed natural urges, that have not yet been constrained by the bounds of marriage.

A thoroughly intriguing and thought-provoking talk on a highly controversial and tentative topic, Professor Lisa Downing and her book provided me with some interesting ideas on the different ways in which murderers are represented, and can be explained.

By Amy Hunt

Richard House: The Kills @ Book to the Future

richard houseThe University of Birmingham’s own Richard House gave a lecture as part of UoB ‘Book to the Future’ literature and spoken word festival last week.

The event was a look into the creative process that culminated in this ‘new age’ sort of novel that was long-listed for the Man Booker Prize. The Kills is just over a thousand pages in length, broken up into four shorter sub-stories: ‘Sutler’, ‘The Massive’, ‘The Kill’, ‘The Hit’. The interesting and new aspect of this novel is the multimedia aspect the book has, with added extras in the form of short film clips and animations. And although House made quite clear the book can be read alone the multimedia extras help to set and change the mood of the extracts.

The event not only gave us an insight into the novel but the man behind it. House spoke about how he was a visual artist before he became a writer, and highlighted the difference between the two, saying his vision and creativity has always had a practical element that comes from working in the visual arts.

All the short films included in The Kills House shot and edited himself on his ipad whilst travelling. He spoke about how the interest of a new medium (the ipad) allowed him to explore new aspects of creating. “When I wasn’t writing I was filming, when I wasn’t filming I was writing”, and the process of an extra layer of video within the book allowed House to think more like the characters he was creating. When he was filming he said he would be thinking “what would Mizuki be thinking, what would she be looking at?” As a creative writer myself I found this fascinating; it’s almost as if via his ipad House was able to explore the world via the sight of his created characters. The videos as well as adding to the novel also acted as a creative exercise furthering the character and plot in his own mind.

The incredible thing about The Kills is all the extra information that goes around it and all the extra work and effort put in to create a world with people and voices. For example ‘The Kill’, the third sub-book within the novel, is referenced by Sutler in the first as a ‘terrible book’ and then again later as a film based upon the original book.  This added extra really gives a personal connection to the audience as they feel immersed into House’s world. This is furthered by the concept of flipping a coin to determine how you read ‘The Kill’. House advises readers to flip a coin and depending on its outcome read the book in chronological order or character by character, making the experience of reading rather more personal.

‘The Kill’ started out as a murder mystery set in Naples, but not wanting to write “just another crime novel in Naples,” House decided to take the advice given to all writers: write what you know. So he wrote a crime novel from the perspective of the outsiders, the people on the periphery. This changed the piece from just another crime in the stereotypically violent and corrupt Naples, to an insight into the people caught up in something they don’t really understand.

The event for me was incredibly interesting and enjoyable in spite of a few technical errors. It gave me an insight into the world of visual arts, and how in this day and age a novel can be so much more than simply words on a page.

By Noemi Barranca.


Creative Minds at Birmingham: Jamie McKendrick @ Book to the Future

Last Thursday saw the launch of ‘Creative Minds at Birmingham’ when award-winning poet Jamie McKendrick took to the stage of the Elgar Concert Hall at the Bramall Music Building to share with us literature enthusiasts his poetical works.

There was quite a turn out as students from different subject areas, lecturers and enthusiasts outside of University attended the event. It is always great to listen and speak to a modern day author about his or her works. The event was opened with an introduction to Jamie McKendrick, highlighting especially his work on Out There (2012), his latest collection of poetry. This followed readings from the collection and other poetry collections by Jamie McKendrick himself.

One of the poems which really stood out to me in Jamie McKendrick’s reading was ‘Singing Lessons’ to which he explained to us his motives and inspiration for writing about – quite literally – singing lessons. He wrote this after the death of his brother-in-law as a way of expressing the lament people often feel when a loved one has died. Whether it be for words that were never said, or things that we regret doing or saying while they were still alive, here Jamie transforms it into a singing lesson which his brother-in-law took and which he teased him about. It is often some of the most small or seemingly irrelevant things that come to mind in our memories in the passing of a loved one which was clearly expressed through ‘Singing Lessons’.

sunflowersJamie McKendrick also read us a poem from an older collection Ink Stone (2003) called ‘Chrome Yellow’ on one of Van Gogh’s sunflower paintings. He doesn’t call this an ekphrastic poem but his take on it certainly shows elements of this. He focuses particularly on the power of yellow in relation to one of the most powerful parts of this poem, his direct reference to Van Gogh as a “mad Dutchman”:

“That mad Dutchman who crammed his mouth with the chrome yellow he used by the tubeful to paint them made toxic lead his edible gold” (From Ink Stone, 2003).

In passing, Jamie McKendrick would mention his experiences on being a contemporary poet. He particularly described his commissioned works being one of the most difficult in working on, in virtue of the very fact that they commissioned; it would lead to lengthy arguments about the final product of certain pieces.

The question and answer at the end allowed us to further get to know the life of a modern day writer and it was also a way of getting advice for budding writers. Not surprisingly, one of the first questions asked was how to distinguish the difference between a poem and a lyric, to which Jamie answered simply that the lyric is wholly reliant on music while poetry isn’t. One of the most interesting questions that relate to the modern day was how far to go when translating the work of other writers. Jamie replied that it essentially relies on what you feel is alright: “if it looks alright leave it as it is”.  He further went on to give advice about the distinction in translating works that have been done before and works of your contemporaries.

Listening to Jamie McKendrick read out his poetry allows us to engage, with not only any biographical aspects of his work, but we also get to see the poems in exactly the way intended, this includes every moment of pause or emphasis on particular words or sections, something that other readers might not have the advantage of.

The event ended with a book signing giving everyone a chance to meet Jamie McKendrick in person. This is just the start of the ‘Creative Minds at Birmingham’ series, future events include other writers like Michael Longley, Alice Oswald and Kathleen Jamie.

by Malia Choudhury

Jamie McKendrick Interview @ Book to the Future

Jamie McKendrick
Award-winning poet Jamie McKendrick was kind enough to join me for a chat prior to his speech in the Elgar Concert Hall launching the ‘Creative Minds at Birmingham’ series.

Over a cigarette and a cup of tea he discussed the prospect of reading his poems, and I wondered whether he prefers hearing his poetry aloud or whether it is written to be read; indeed, whether he sees poetry as a visual or auditory art form. Jamie suggested that:

“The acoustic element is crucial for poems. There doesn’t seem to be a point in writing poems if you’re not thinking about the sound, the lineation, the rhythm – all of those elements are at the fore of the poem.”

“I mean, you don’t read it with your eye. It’s quite possible someone could read it a lot better than me,” he says whilst laughing. “I don’t care who reads it but it should be read aloud, and even if it’s read with the eye it should be sounded inside. The layout on the page is visual, yes, so it does have a presence on the page, but the layout is often indicative of auditory patterns.”

We moved on to the topic of translations; he recently won the Oxford-Weidenfeld Prize and the John Florio Italian Translation Prize for translating the poetry of Valerio Magrelli. When asked what attracted him to this task in particular, he explained that whilst in Italy he read The Embrace, the poem which the collection takes its name from, and that it “struck me immediately as going into English.” Although the process took around fifteen to twenty years to complete, Jamie described it as an “exciting challenge”.

Alongside Italian poets, he lists Seamus Heaney and Elizabeth Bishop as personal favourites. He recalled reading Bishop in his twenties, stating she “means a lot to me”, before declaring Heaney a “wonderfully exemplary figure… when I started writing he made it look possible to be beautiful and relevant.”

Since McKendrick’s careers spans more than forty years, my final question was the one I was most eager to ask: ‘what inspires you to write?’ In modest fashion, Jamie admitted that it’s “just a bad habit really … a compulsion … you feel bereft when you’re not writing,” before memorably concluding that, rather than his experiences inspiring his writing, his writing is what enables him to bring his experiences “into harmony”.

by Ellicia Pendle

Lionel Shriver @ Birmingham Literature Festival

LionelShriverFrom a few days after my GCSE English teacher thrust a worn out copy of We Need to Talk about Kevin into my hands, promising me that it would be the best thing I had ever read, I have loved Lionel Shriver’s work; so the fact that I was able to be in the same room as her around five years later is something that I am still coming to terms with.

Lionel Shriver was at the Birmingham Literature Festival (formerly known as the Birmingham Book Festival) to speak about her new novel, Big Brother, which follows the turmoil experienced by Pandora, a middle-aged woman who makes speaking dolls for a living, after her once near-perfect brother turns up a few-hundred pounds heavier.

I must admit that I haven’t actually got round to reading Big Brother yet, and probably won’t get to for at least another year (I have a self-enforced ban on all reading that is not related to my degree or dissertation), but this session with Shriver made me want to throw everything aside and read then and there.

As one would expect, Shriver’s novel is concerned with the political and personal. On one level, the novel is concerned with responsibility: to what extent should healthcare services be responsible for looking after the obese; and to what extent are our friends and family responsible for us? Where do our loyalties truly lie? Of course, the layers of the novel are wonderfully complex, with Pandora juggling the roles of sister, wife and step-mother; her brother’s presence causes severe conflict between Pandora and her husband, Fletcher.

Another of the novel’s most interesting concerns is fame, a topic Shriver had a lot to say about. Shriver claimed that anonymity is a blessing, and appreciates the fact that she has never been recognised in Tesco and can still buy reduced fish without being judged. That is not to say that she loathes all recognition: ‘I’m here, after all,’ she quipped. What Shriver claims is that it’s healthier being appreciated for one’s talent and work, rather than an obsession with every detail of a celebrity’s lifestyle.

Shriver has learnt this the hard way. Big Brother is inspired by her brother’s obesity-related death, but her ultimate aim was to protect him. To do so she wrote an article for The Financial Times explaining her motivations. She subsequently sold the article to The Daily Mail, on the proviso that it would be printed exactly as it was. The latter publication made significant changes to the article, using a headline somewhere along the lines of: ‘My brother ate himself to death’. During these moments Shriver was incredibly honest, admitting that this was her biggest regret.

What was most striking about Shriver was her eloquence. When the evening proceeded to the audience Q&A, Shriver paused to consider her responses and was able to articulate her ideas exceptionally well; my favourite point of the evening was Shriver’s defence of her work: ‘My novels are not cynical. My novels are dark – yes. But they are not cynical.’ This is what makes Shriver such a presence: she is articulate, funny and serious – somehow all at the same time. She is also incredibly self-aware and has an astute understanding of personal relationships.

Then the typical but much-anticipated question was asked: what is Shriver working on next? A novel that is at bit Orwellian, by the sounds of it: ‘Let me tell you, we have not experienced financial ruin yet,’ Shriver said darkly. ‘I’ll be writing a near-future novel,’ she admitted. ‘I was thinking that I could still be alive in 2040 and that scared me.’

One of my greatest fears (which has been realised) is that when you meet your hero, they will be a mere shadow of the person you had hoped they would be. Fortunately, Shriver was exactly as I had hoped, and so much more. Should she ever return to Birmingham (or wherever I live in the next few years), I’ll be on the front row.

By Jenna Clake

Writers’ Bloc Presents: Inter-University Poetry Slam

Writers’ Bloc hosted a multi-team inter-university poetry slam against Pembroke College, Cambridge, and an array of poets from Birmingham (non-university affiliated), who were charmingly dubbed ‘COW’ (Coalition Of Wordsmiths) by Chazz Redhead, the compere for the evening. COW saved the day after Cardiff University pulled out of the competition.

slam review
For those who are not familiar with slam etiquette, the format of the evening was as follows: we began with the ‘Sacrificial Poet’ round, in which a poet from each team performed, in order to display how the voting system would work (audience members held up a red ‘C’ for COW, a blue ‘P’ for Pembroke or a yellow ‘B’ for Birmingham, depending on who they thought performed the best poem). The votes from the Sacrificial Poet round did not contribute to the final scores. This round was then followed by four rounds in which a poet from each team would perform one poem, with a strict time limit of three minutes; this process would be repeated in the second half. The audience voted after every round; the poet with the most votes would win a point for their team.

By pulling slips of paper from his shoe, Chazz announced the running order of the first half: COW, Pembroke, Birmingham.

892515_10152662468525092_2108589660_oCOW’s Sacrificial Poet was Bohdan Piasecki, who is a renowned Birmingham-based poet from Poland, and also runs popular poetry night Hit the Ode. Bohdan quipped that he was going to perform something that was ‘really about the performance, rather than the meaning’ and launched into a fast-paced poem written entirely in Polish. While most of the audience had no idea what Bohdan was saying, his poem showed that slam poets need to concentrate on their performance, as well as their writing.

He was followed by Phoebe Power (for Pembroke), winner of a 2012 Eric Gregory Award and the 2009 Foyle Young Poet of the Year. She gave a very confident delivery of a poem in the voice of Dido (not the singer, the one from the Aeneid). The last Sacrificial Poet was Ben Jackson, who read a beautiful poem called Write Me in Your Diary. He took his performance to another level by interacting with the audience, which was evidently popular, as he was named winner of the round.

Now that the audience was clued in on how to vote, it was time for the main two rounds. James Walpole was up first for COW. It was quite evident that James was not used to slam poetry, as he read from the page (typically, slam poets are meant to have memorised their work) and also ran out of time. At times it was difficult to hear James, but considering the short notice he was given to be involved in the slam, he did well and the poem was very funny. A poet called Tristam was up next for Pembroke. He had a charming slam review 4stage presence, and had the audience in stitches with his poem about not being able to ride a bike until the age of nineteen. Writers’ Bloc’s Lily Blacksell concluded (and won) the round with a poem about unrequited love. It’s a topic that is frequently written about, but Lily brought something new and personal to it. Her performance was also first-class, as she used her experience in acting to make her poem completely relatable and humorous. There were also moments of beautiful poignancy, however, especially created by a line about an ‘undeniably single bed’.

It would be impossible to give you a play-by-play of the evening, so instead I shall focus on the remaining highlights. Tiffany Kang from Pembroke College quite simply stole the show. Her soothing, hypnotic voice was used fantastically in her poems. As an American poet, she brought something completely different to the competition, showing that British and American styles of poetry are completely different, but equally entertaining.

Elisha Owen’s (UoB) poem about her relationship with her father was a personal favourite. It was touching without being too sentimental, and captured the difficulties of how growing up can affect such an important relationship.

Ben Norris (UoB) performed two great poems: Disaster Sex and Dismembered Voices. He had clearly focused on the delivery on his poems, which was infallible and energetic, but his poems were also great in their own right. All of this is even much more impressive when one remembers that Ben was also organising the entire evening, and was actually responsible for the formation of COW.

Lorna Meehan (COW) dealt with comic and serious subjects in her poems, but really shone with her poem about Michael Bublé. She was engaging, entertaining and truly likeable. All the women in the audience could relate to her, but her poetry was so well written that everyone was won over.

Finally, James Grady showed that you don’t need three minutes to impress an audience, you just need a little over one. His poem Crossword was full of hilarious innuendo and was undeniably catchy. It was a short but sweet way to win the support of the audience.

Mention must also be given to the wonderful compere, Chazz. He was funny, irreverent, sarcastic and very self-aware, which helped toslam review 3 move the already entertaining evening to new heights. Some poetry nights can be a little slow-moving, but this slam was filled with boundless energy, and left the audience wanting more.

At the end of the evening, the University of Birmingham was announced as the winner of the slam, with only one point between them
and the runners-up. However, as Chazz reminded us, the night wasn’t about winning; it was a celebration of poetry and talent.

By Jenna Clake


Tell Me On A Sunday: Strange Encounters @ Ikon Gallery

Tell me on a Sunday is a series of storytelling events held at the Ikon Gallery, where selected tellers go up on stage and tell their anecdotes relating to a set theme. Before the event commenced there was a chance to socialise with other audience members, in the gallery’s cafe that serves tea, coffee and soft drinks and even muffins.This week’s Tell Me on a Sunday was based around the theme of ‘Strange Encounters’.

The dim-lit, small and social audience make the sharing of stories an intimate event. It is hosted by Cat Weatherill, one of Europe’s tell-meleading performance storytellers who set the theme after being inspired by Valentine’s Day. She responded well to each seven-minute performance, drawing us in and out of each teller’s life. Some of the storytellers told their story in a very conversational way, using hand movements to express themselves, which further added to their performance. The comedienne Naomi Paul, however, crafted her story with a performance perfect structure instead of a conversational anecdote. Her story provided a neat beginning, middle and end.

The stories range from humorous to tragic and ‘all with truth at their heart’. This just goes to show how far the theme can be interpreted. One story, by a retired teacher-turned-writer touched us all as he told us how his failed attempt at resuscitating a person has had a lasting effect on his life. Furthermore, the idea of not knowing the young man’s name still stays with him today.

Journalist William Gallagher enticed us to his story with his love of Sci-fi; he made us believe that he had actually witnessed, in his own blogfest picwords, a ‘shiny glowing disc’. Not only a shiny glowing disc, but that a woman was abducted by aliens. This ended with the humorous realisation that the woman possessed the car keys.

Through the variety of funny and emotional stories, we were able to relate to some aspect of the tellers’ experience. What I really loved about the event is that it goes back to the oral tradition of storytelling, where the teller is not restricted by the barrier of pen and paper, allowing the teller’s story to flow and touch us in an authentic way.

By Malia Choudhury

The next Tell Me On A Sunday is at the Ikon Gallery Cafe on Sunday 17th March. To reserve call the Ikon Gallery (0121 248 0708). The facebook event is: